2016-05-31 UTC
jasnell joined the channel
# 03:33 Loqi Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next jasnell, shepazu, bblfish, bblfish_ and manuel joined the channel
jasnell, eprodrom, cwebber2`, tantek and annbass joined the channel
# 16:44 wilkie I'll be in portland the night of the 9th and not before! sorry, all. new funding source means reset on vacation days. :/ # 16:44 wilkie hopefully I'll be able to demo things remotely # 16:46 rhiaro Interested in what you're demoing wilkie! If you haven't already, add it to the proposed agenda items # 16:46 tantek wilkie, we're clustering implementation updates (demos) by spec KevinMarks and KevinMarks2 joined the channel
# 17:01 rhiaro dialling but webex is silent after the meeting number... is it just me or is there something that needs to happen which hasn't yet? # 17:02 rhiaro It didn't even get to "enter your attendee id number" though # 17:02 eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: no # 17:02 rhiaro by 'me' I mean 'the phone in sandro's office' # 17:02 ben_thatmustbeme eprodrom: i can only make the first few minutes of the meeting, we have to close on the house very soon # 17:03 eprodrom Good luck on the house thing Lloyd_Fassett joined the channel
# 17:03 eprodrom Can't it wait till next week? # 17:04 eprodrom tantek: I realize that # 17:04 eprodrom It's something we'll have to decide in --- 6 minutes, it looks like? RRSAgent joined the channel
Zakim joined the channel
dmitriz joined the channel
# 17:06 wilkie tantek: one thing was ben_thatmustbeme asked for reordering the agenda to place jf2 first because he has to leave # 17:07 wilkie eprodrom: the idea is to have ben_thatmustbeme tell us what he proposes # 17:07 wilkie ben_thatmustbeme: yes, I propose to have jf2 move to a working draft this week # 17:07 wilkie ben_thatmustbeme: I asked for people to have a look at it for this week # 17:07 tantek this is a FPWD (first public working draft) AFAIK # 17:07 wilkie eprodrom: just quickly, has everybody read the current editor's draft? # 17:08 wilkie eprodrom: kevin, you are co-editor, so I would hope you've read it hah # 17:08 wilkie tantek: has it been stable for a while or has there been changes? # 17:08 wilkie ben_thatmustbeme: there have been minor changes. there is a note in the document to say it is meant as a note. no substantial changes. # 17:08 wilkie aaronpk: I remember that the changes made have been made based on implementations using it # 17:09 tantek because we accepted it in December as Note-track # 17:09 wilkie eprodrom: I haven't read the document yet. have you aaronpk? # 17:09 wilkie aaronpk: yeah, skimmed it. and re-reading it. # 17:09 wilkie eprodrom: so we are making this a note ben_thatmustbeme? # 17:09 wilkie ben_thatmustbeme: yeah we agreed about this at the last f2f # 17:09 wilkie sandro: anybody remember the reasoning for that? bengo joined the channel
# 17:09 wilkie ben_thatmustbeme: partly time constraints, and so it doesn't seem as a competitor for as2 # 17:10 wilkie sandro: the reason I ask is it is easier to start on the rec track than to switch later # 17:10 eprodrom PROPOSED: publish current Editor's Draft of JF2 as First Public Working Draft in Note track # 17:10 wilkie eprodrom: I put up a proposal to add this working draft to the note track. does that make sense, ben_thatmustbeme? # 17:11 wilkie eprodrom: unless there is any other discussion before we engage with this, please give your votes # 17:11 eprodrom RESOLVED: publish current Editor's Draft of JF2 as First Public Working Draft in Note track # 17:11 wilkie eprodrom: unless we have anyone else who feels strongly about this... going once, going twice... # 17:12 wilkie eprodrom: going to mark this resolved [reads resolution] # 17:12 wilkie eprodrom: so I got 12 minutes after the hour. hopefully you can make it to your closing, ben_thatmustbeme # 17:12 wilkie sandro: before publishing we need to know what the name is going to be # 17:12 wilkie sandro: we can do that later but it's easier to do it now # 17:13 wilkie tantek: so should we say if anybody wants to propose alternatives, they can do so # 17:13 wilkie sandro: this is kind of an odd name. it usually stands for something # 17:13 wilkie eprodrom: it is jf2 because it is mf2 with json right? # 17:13 tantek "unify various simplified versions of the Microformats-2 representative JSON format" # 17:14 wilkie sandro: that is, if I had never heard of jf2 before # 17:14 wilkie eprodrom: once it has a URI it is kind of engraved in stone right? # 17:15 wilkie sandro: not impossible to change later, you can forward the URL # 17:15 wilkie KevinMarks: this isn't too bad. we had some other acronyms that were much more adventurous. # 17:15 tantek sandro does it help to allow for either? in case w3c management doesn't like our first choice? # 17:15 eprodrom PROPOSED: publish JF2 FPWD with short name "jf2" # 17:15 wilkie eprodrom: let me see if I can form a proposal... with what do you call it.. "short name" # 17:16 tantek +1 and also ok with sandro's proposal "json-microformats2" # 17:16 wilkie eprodrom: alright. unless there are any objections, I will mark this resolved. # 17:16 eprodrom RESOLVED: publish JF2 FPWD with short name "jf2" # 17:17 sandro action: sandro get domain lead approval for JF2 # 17:17 trackbot Created ACTION-90 - Get domain lead approval for jf2 [on Sandro Hawke - due 2016-06-07]. # 17:17 wilkie eprodrom: fantastic. thanks KevinMarks and ben. thanks for your work on the document. looking forward to seeing it live. # 17:18 wilkie eprodrom: alright. great. let's move on to next/first item: minutes from last week jasnell joined the channel
# 17:19 wilkie eprodrom: given we have overwhelming support, we'll mark this as resolved # 17:20 wilkie eprodrom: another item on the agenda is next week's f2f # 17:20 wilkie eprodrom: I don't think there is further discussion to have about the f2f. but this is a good time to bring those up # 17:20 wilkie tantek: we are starting to put together the specific agenda for the f2f # 17:21 wilkie tantek: one thing sandro and I noticed to cover is implementation updates and so we put that first for monday morning # 17:21 wilkie tantek: for the most mature/advanced specs going toward the newer/less-implemented latter in the process # 17:21 wilkie tantek: chairs are actively putting the agenda together # 17:21 wilkie tantek: if anybody has things they want to discuss, add them # 17:22 wilkie eprodrom: all right. great. any other issues we need to discuss for next tuesday # 17:22 wilkie eprodrom: I think our attendee list is stable. if you are on the fence or considering, get your name on there because we are planning. # 17:22 wilkie eprodrom: if there is no other discussion on this, I'd like to move on to as2 # 17:23 wilkie eprodrom: two weeks ago we decided to publish new working drafts of AS2 # 17:23 wilkie eprodrom: we have the core document (i've dropped the URL) and a vocabulary document # 17:24 wilkie eprodrom: these are not materially different from the version we've had as an editor's draft for the past weeks # 17:24 wilkie eprodrom: there were validation issues and small changes but nothing noticeable by anybody not a as2 validator # 17:24 wilkie eprodrom: yes, editorial markup changes, thank you tantek # 17:24 wilkie eprodrom: the question from last week was whether to move as2 to a candidate recommendation # 17:25 wilkie eprodrom: in march in the last f2f we resolved to take it to CR following correction of some outstanding issues, which have been addressed along with additional ones since the f2f # 17:25 wilkie eprodrom: the intention was to discuss taking it to CR today # 17:25 Zakim sandro, you wanted to discuss normative references # 17:26 wilkie sandro: one small problem that is trivial to fix is when you go to CR you have to fix up the normative references # 17:26 wilkie sandro: basically w3c wants to make sure external specs are as stable as this spec # 17:26 wilkie sandro: when I looked at the normative references... all the ones in vocab are fine, but core had 2 normative references that looked problematic # 17:27 wilkie sandro: all are w3c or ietf standards except for as1 and CURIE # 17:28 tantek that seems confusing to have it referenced separately than JSON-LD # 17:28 wilkie sandro: but where as1 and curie are used are in non-normative references or, for CURIE, to note json-ld supports them # 17:28 wilkie sandro: I think we can just take out the CURIE reference # 17:28 sandro +1 tantek, take out "(or CURIE's for short) [curie]." # 17:28 wilkie eprodrom: as what we can do is make as1 an informative reference, which I think I can do # 17:28 wilkie eprodrom: and the second is to remove reference to CURIE # 17:29 wilkie eprodrom: it is mentioned as an aside, so we just remove the aside and the reference to it # 17:29 wilkie eprodrom: so those are two important issues to handle right now # 17:29 wilkie eprodrom: my question is if we decide to go to CR today can we do so conditionally that we resolve these two # 17:30 wilkie sandro: we can go to CR given we do the changes decided at this meeting # 17:30 wilkie sandro: maybe there will be other issues today # 17:30 wilkie eprodrom: just dropping the issue links into the channel # 17:30 wilkie eprodrom: there was one more issue that rhiaro raised a few days ago # 17:30 wilkie eprodrom: I think it was about JSON-LD... well, rhiaro, if you are here, can you give us an overview? # 17:31 wilkie rhiaro: the json-ld version on w3c is not up-to-date. we can easily fix that. # 17:31 wilkie eprodrom: it is just an update process, but we should probably get that done. # 17:31 wilkie eprodrom: sandro, can you follow through on that? # 17:31 wilkie eprodrom: let me know if there is anything I can do for that process # 17:32 wilkie eprodrom: that file has been updated so it is best to use the one on github right now # 17:32 wilkie eprodrom: I feel funny being both chair and advocate for this, but hopefully we can handle that. # 17:32 wilkie eprodrom: if tantek wants to chair for this we can do that # 17:32 wilkie tantek: I think you are doing great but I can do that if you want # 17:33 wilkie annbass: eprodrom, I sent you in snail-mail some english type edits. did you receive that? # 17:33 wilkie annbass: I didn't have a chance to read through this version. # 17:33 wilkie annbass: I'm just looking at misspellings and words being left out, etc. # 17:33 wilkie eprodrom: I did receive those. sorry I didn't mention those. they were all editorial changes... super helpful. # 17:33 wilkie eprodrom: some have been changed already, some have not. I want to get the ones that haven't into github issues. # 17:34 wilkie annbass: I leave this to your judgment. I want to know if we need to do a re-read. any before CR? # 17:34 wilkie sandro: no. editorial changes don't need that. # 17:34 wilkie annbass: ok. I'll make an effort to go through this version. # 17:35 wilkie eprodrom: so, if there is no further discussion, I would love to propose the current working draft as CR. I forget the exact phrasing for the options we have. # 17:35 wilkie tantek: so, we are proposing to take the current working draft with the edits agreed in this meeting to CR. # 17:35 tantek PROPOSED: Take current WD of AS2, with edits agreed in this telcon to CR # 17:36 wilkie tantek: and those edits include the normative references: one being made informal and one being dropped. # 17:36 tantek PROPOSED: Take current WDs of AS2, with edits agreed in this telcon to CR # 17:36 wilkie tantek: that's why I wanted to update that proposal # 17:36 cwebber2 my second +1 was to updated proposal, not stuffing ballots ;) # 17:36 Zakim Present: tantek, wilkie, rhiaro, dmitriz, ben_thatmustbeme, aaronpk, eprodrom, cwebber, bengo, annbass # 17:37 Zakim On IRC I see jasnell, bengo, dmitriz, Zakim, RRSAgent, KevinMarks2, KevinMarks, annbass, tantek, cwebber2, eprodrom, manuel, shepazu, pdurbin, rhiaro, dwhly, ben_thatmustbeme, # 17:37 Zakim ... Loqi, Arnaud, bigbluehat, strugee, aaronpk, raucao, wilkie, wseltzer, sandro, trackbot, jet, tsyesika, ElijahLynn, bitbear # 17:37 wilkie tantek: looks we have the vast majority of people in the call which is awesome eprodrom joined the channel
# 17:37 tantek RESOLVED: Take current WDs of AS2, with edits agreed in this telcon to CR # 17:38 wilkie tantek: I'm going to mark this resolved. thank you every one. congratulations to the editors. # 17:38 wilkie sandro: we need to draft a transition request # 17:38 wilkie tantek: right, like we did for webmention and make that call # 17:38 wilkie tantek: I think that means, eprodrom, you can make those changes to the draft. # 17:38 wilkie tantek: I don't think we need to republish with that # 17:39 wilkie eprodrom: unfortunately I have one more thing we need to discuss before we do that # 17:40 wilkie eprodrom: at our last meeting, there was discussion about moving our github repos to the w3c organizational namespace # 17:40 wilkie eprodrom: I'm not sure where we closed on that # 17:40 wilkie eprodrom: as we move to CR, does that become more important? # 17:40 wilkie eprodrom: just because the github repos are embedded in the document # 17:40 wilkie eprodrom: if we were to do that, we should do that now before publishing a new WD # 17:41 wilkie sandro: so. w3c has an organizational committment to preservation of info and data. # 17:41 wilkie sandro: most w3c working groups use repos under the w3c organization and the team has set up an archiving system to archive those repos. # 17:41 wilkie sandro: during the webmention transition call it was brought up that we aren't doing that for this group's work # 17:41 wilkie sandro: I made an action item to look in if we can do that and the team said 'no, if you want to archive that you should move' # 17:42 wilkie sandro: as a decentralization guy I'm inclined to say 'no!' # 17:42 wilkie sandro: there are options but I haven't looked at them much rrika joined the channel
# 17:42 wilkie sandro: one of the tools I found written in a language that scares me and it puts the issues inside the repo which seems elegant # 17:43 wilkie sandro: basically if one person wants to figure this out and run this either on a w3c machine or your own that you can curl when you need # 17:43 wilkie eprodrom: ok great. I appreciate the concept of decentralization. keeping us decentralized on the same centralized code-hosting service, I'm not committed to it. # 17:44 wilkie eprodrom: unless jasnell has a strong objection, I'd prefer to use the w3c namespace. # 17:44 wilkie eprodrom: github has some mechanisms for redirects when you reassign the owner of a repository # 17:44 wilkie eprodrom: I believe it will retain the issue history, etc. they do a pretty good job of it. # 17:45 wilkie sandro: that's true. the movement from one editor to another editor highlights why you may want to do that # 17:45 wilkie sandro: I don't think we should twist aaronpk's arm to do the same thing # 17:45 wilkie tantek: eprodrom, it sounds like you have a specific proposal to make # 17:45 wilkie eprodrom: yes, I propose we move the official repo for as2 to the w3c [github] namespace # 17:46 wilkie tantek: can you give me a url for the proposal # 17:46 wilkie sandro: one slight glitch on that is that I see this already exists # 17:46 wilkie sandro: seems like harry made this a year ago # 17:46 rhiaro the other WGs have all their drafts in one sub directory I think # 17:47 wilkie sandro: it might be hard, but maybe we can just delete the existing one and then make a new one # 17:47 wilkie aaronpk: yeah, you just need to delete the old one first # 17:47 wilkie sandro: oh, rhiaro is saying it goes under the workgroup name? # 17:47 wilkie tantek: sounds like rhiaro has a counter-proposal. can we get that in IRC Lloyd_Fassett joined the channel
# 17:47 rhiaro Yeah I agree with the things that are a bad idea about that # 17:48 wilkie aaronpk: that sounds like a bad idea because it seems issues get merged into a single repo # 17:48 wilkie sandro: no, we definitely want separate repos per spec # 17:48 wilkie sandro: I see some repos for groups and some for specs and I think repos for working groups is a bad idea and they didn't realize it at the time # 17:48 wilkie tantek: looks like annotations did exactly what you say is a bad idea # 17:49 wilkie sandro: no, yeah. and I see people talking about this and they have to tag issues.. yeah # 17:49 wilkie sandro: I think using short-names, and yeah for activity streams we merge two into one, but we can do that # 17:49 wilkie tantek: do we use one URL for both of them... is it activitystreams or activitysteams dash vocab? # 17:50 wilkie eprodrom: I can live with either. let's keep it under activitystreams then # 17:50 wilkie tantek: activitystreams slash vocab?? sorry, I'm looking for specifics for the minutes # 17:50 wilkie sandro: so I'm renaming the old repo to the new repo, right? # 17:51 wilkie eprodrom: and the directory structure would stay the same # 17:51 eprodrom activitystreams-core -> core # 17:51 eprodrom activitystreams-vocabulary -> vocabulary # 17:52 wilkie eprodrom: yeah, they are both already in one repo right now # 17:52 wilkie tantek: eprodrom, does that match your understanding? # 17:53 wilkie tantek: that looks good. I'm going to resolve that. # 17:53 wilkie eprodrom: we will need a proposal to publish a WD with those changes # 17:54 wilkie annbass: small question for eprodrom... from the version I printed that was 40 pages... were there any significant changes to that? # 17:54 wilkie sandro: I'm going to delete the repo harry made # 17:54 wilkie sandro: should I talk to jasnell about the changes or what? # 17:55 wilkie tantek: ok. the proposal is to publish a new WD with the changes to the repo. when combined with earlier proposal, it is clear this is still what will become the CR. # 17:55 sandro github says: Your repository "w3c/activitystreams" was successfully deleted. # 17:56 aaronpk only an owner of the w3c org will be able to move the repo to it, so you'll probably have to give sandro full permissions on james' repo # 17:56 wilkie tantek: I think you have everything you need from the group # 17:56 eprodrom chair: eprodrom # 17:56 wilkie tantek: with the edits and changes, you will have the working draft the group wants to put to CR # 17:56 wilkie eprodrom: I will take over as chair to get through the rest of the agenda # 17:56 wilkie eprodrom: we have 2 items and I'm concerned that we don't have enough time # 17:57 wilkie eprodrom: I would like to ask the 2 editors involved to ask if it would make sense to put these on the agenda of the f2f # 17:57 wilkie eprodrom: or we could extend the meeting 15 minutes to address them # 17:57 wilkie aaronpk: I have a short update but I'm ok to extend # 17:57 wilkie eprodrom: barring any objections, I'm going to extend the meeting 15 minutes. continuing until 2:15 # 17:58 wilkie eprodrom: since aaronpk is giving only an update I'll put you at the end of the agenda # 17:58 wilkie eprodrom: so, rhiaro. next up is Social Web Protocols. Could you give us an update? # 17:59 wilkie rhiaro: I rewrote the document. I would like to publish a new working draft. I closed many issues and I was hoping to address the rest. # 17:59 wilkie rhiaro: annbass gave great editorial changes. I think everybody read it and had time to raise issues. # 18:00 wilkie eprodrom: I have not had a chance to read through it fully but have skimmed it and it seems like an improvement in terms of readability. # 18:00 wilkie eprodrom: from my point of view, it seems like there is a strong argument to going to a next working draft unless significant problems with this version. # 18:00 aaronpk it looks like a big update, i haven't read the whole thing, but I trust amy's judgment on it # 18:00 wilkie eprodrom: another option is to make it required reading for the f2f and propose at the f2f # 18:01 wilkie eprodrom: I think it is a significant enough improvement to share this with the world as a WD # 18:01 tantek I think publishing is also a good way to get more people in the group read it for the f2f :) # 18:01 wilkie sandro: is there anything in this draft you feel would give people the wrong impression? # 18:01 wilkie rhiaro: there are a few gaps but I have called them out and I think they're fine # 18:01 wilkie tantek: a lot has changed since we published a draft of this. I feel there is more confusion leaving the old one there. # 18:02 wilkie eprodrom: my question, is there any work that needs to be done before pushing this to working draft? # 18:02 wilkie eprodrom: so it is ready, this version, for a WD? # 18:02 wilkie eprodrom: what I would like to do propose we publish the editor's draft of 31 May 2016 of Social Web Protocols as a Working Draft? # 18:02 eprodrom PROPOSAL: publish Editor's Draft 31 May 2016 of Social Web Protocols as a Working Draft # 18:04 eprodrom RESOLVED: publish Editor's Draft 31 May 2016 of Social Web Protocols as a Working Draft # 18:04 wilkie eprodrom: unless there are any objections, I'll mark this as resolved # 18:04 annbass BTW, I thought this doc was really good, and will be really helpful as a partner to the other documents # 18:04 wilkie eprodrom: thank you rhiaro for all the hard work. looks like a lot of effort went into it and I appreciate it. # 18:04 wilkie eprodrom: that went a lot quicker than I thought which is good news. I'd like to move on to webmention test suite. # 18:05 wilkie aaronpk: what I did was go through the implementation checklist into todo items for code to write for each # 18:05 wilkie aaronpk: those are all open issues on the test suite itself # 18:05 wilkie aaronpk: this process turned up editorial issues in the spec which are issues opened on the spec itself # 18:05 wilkie aaronpk: I would appreciate anyone to chime in about those issues # 18:06 wilkie aaronpk: on webmention.rocks right now there are two tests receiving webmentions so you can try those out # 18:06 wilkie aaronpk: it will actually post comments on your site # 18:06 wilkie eprodrom: any additional comments on webmention test suite? # 18:06 wilkie tantek: this isn't about the test suite it is about the f2f # 18:07 wilkie eprodrom: oh cool. there is one more item on the agenda and that is document status # 18:07 rhiaro q+ to say could we make SWP required reading for the face to face as well by the way # 18:07 wilkie eprodrom: I want to touch base with cwebber2 and rhiaro about document status # 18:07 wilkie eprodrom: I want to ask the editors of documents we haven't addressed already the meeting for a status update # 18:07 wilkie eprodrom: this is an excellent time to do new versions before the f2f # 18:08 wilkie cwebber2: I just finished moving and I have not had time. and tsyesika has just started moving. so no updates. # 18:08 wilkie eprodrom: aaronpk, any other updates on micropub? # 18:08 annbass it's a moving plague! cwebber, tsyesika and ben_thatmustbeme ... sheesh # 18:08 tantek rhiaro, feel free to add latest editor's drafts of Webmention, AS2, Micropub, Activitypub to that list # 18:08 wilkie aaronpk: I don't think anything has changed since last call. I was working on webmention stuff. # 18:09 wilkie eprodrom: tantek, has there been any activity on post-type-discovery # 18:09 wilkie tantek: yes, I got help from ben roberts on doing a github version of the spec and want to have a version of that for FPWD for the f2f # 18:09 wilkie eprodrom: do you think there will be a version before the f2f to make it required reading # 18:10 wilkie tantek: what I can do is to point you to the wiki. I don't think there will be any non-editorial changes. # 18:10 eprodrom Thanks cwebber2 # 18:10 wilkie tantek: in particular the only piece that will be important to discuss is the algorithm so I'll point directly to that # 18:10 wilkie eprodrom: I'm going to add this as required reading for the f2f next week # 18:10 wilkie eprodrom: rhiaro, you took yourself off the queue, but I would like to add the latest version of Social Web Protocols to required reading too # 18:11 wilkie tantek: I asked rhiaro to go ahead and make that section # 18:11 wilkie eprodrom: if there is nothing else, then I would like to call on tantek. # 18:12 wilkie tantek: the last point is for the f2f, many will be here earlier. I want to encourage you all to add arrival dates. # 18:12 wilkie tantek: there will be opportunities to meet up before the meeting # 18:12 wilkie I'll be there AFTER on the 9th through 12th :) # 18:12 wilkie eprodrom: any other business before the end of the meeting? # 18:13 wilkie eprodrom: if not, I'd like to say thanks everyone for giving more of your time. I think we used it well. I'd like to call the meeting to a close. thanks everyone. # 18:14 Zakim Present: tantek, wilkie, rhiaro, dmitriz, ben_thatmustbeme, aaronpk, eprodrom, cwebber, bengo, annbass # 18:14 Zakim On IRC I see Lloyd_Fassett, rrika, jasnell, dmitriz, Zakim, RRSAgent, KevinMarks2, KevinMarks, annbass, tantek, cwebber2, manuel, shepazu, pdurbin, rhiaro, dwhly, ben_thatmustbeme, # 18:14 Zakim ... Loqi, Arnaud, bigbluehat, strugee, aaronpk, raucao, wilkie, wseltzer, sandro, trackbot, jet, tsyesika, ElijahLynn, bitbear # 18:14 Zakim As of this point the attendees have been tantek, wilkie, rhiaro, dmitriz, ben_thatmustbeme, aaronpk, eprodrom, cwebber, bengo, annbass # 18:35 rhiaro For some reason one of the words i find hardest to spell right is 'activity'. This is unfortunate. # 18:38 wilkie the most unfortunate thing I had to really work on when I was teaching Java at university was spelling public correctly # 18:38 wilkie I have no idea why my brain would constantly slip up on that L KevinMarks2 joined the channel
# 20:35 Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed KevinMarks3 and jasnell joined the channel
# 21:06 tantek FYI I noticed this https://www.w3.org/2016/04/blockchain-workshop/ specifically: "Identity systems, including privacy, security, and confidentiality factors" and "Decentralized processing, computing, and storage infrastructure" seem like they might overlap with some of our use-cases jasnell joined the channel
KevinMarks2, KevinMarks3, KevinMarks4, KevinMarks5, tantek, KevinMarks and jasnell joined the channel
rhiaro !tell cwebber2, tsyesika: Updates client :) https://apps.rhiaro.co.uk/morph/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.amy.gy%2Ffood
Loqi Abasset made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-05-31]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=98539&oldid=98358
KevinMarks present+
ben_thatmustbeme eprodrom: did you happen to see my email to the list?
eprodrom ben_thatmustbeme: no
RRSAgent logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/05/31-social-irc
tantek only one open isuse: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues
aaronpk it looks like both specs are already in the same repo? https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams