2016-08-09 UTC
jasnell, Arnaud1 and Karli joined the channel
Karli and KevinMarks joined the channel
# 16:56 cwebber2 rhiaro: we're calling into the same standard webex line right? annbass joined the channel
melvster joined the channel
RRSAgent joined the channel
Zakim joined the channel
# 17:04 rhiaro melvster: just an informal chat about SWP stuff # 17:14 annbass if translating between Activity Pub and LDN, then all seems fine # 17:14 annbass with JSON-LD and Activity Streams .. should be pretty easy # 17:16 annbass 1. what do we think re: inbox .. could we share that between the two of them? # 17:17 annbass rhiaro: we have small stumbling block with W3C namespace policy .. working on # 17:17 annbass ... 1. we could get this added to LDP .. you could alias your inbox to ours # 17:18 annbass ... 2. OR .. (early to think about) .. IF W3C namespace policy gets updated to allow <something> .. then maybe Activity Pub terms could be added to AS2 namespace # 17:18 annbass cwebber: yes, that'd simplify a lot of things for us # 17:19 annbass ... we don't need a hardcore resolution quite yet .. maybe by end of Sept # 17:20 annbass ... assuming someone could amend the policy .. then, does anyone have any issues with using the AS2 namespace # 17:21 annbass cwebber: I forgot to mention .. the way the inbox is discovered is diff # 17:22 annbass ... I'd be fine in my implementation to support both ways ... # 17:23 annbass rhiaro: actually, LDN says there are 2 ways to discover inbox .. if 1st way fails, then you have to do the 2nd way # 17:23 csarven "These may be carried out in either order, but if the first fails to result in an Inbox the second MUST be tried." # 17:26 annbass csarven: is there an issue where the receiver announces a header, but it's only found in body? (not sure I got that correctly) # 17:27 annbass ... you specify a 201 be returned to confirm, we should add that to AP # 17:28 annbass rhiaro: yes, although what's in the notification, is a black box # 17:28 annbass ... LDN lets you send just whatever is relevant to what you're doing # 17:29 annbass ... I've written, but not typed up, how I see this working # 17:30 annbass ... what I'm trying to do, is make it easy enough that AP could use the LDN stuff to do XYZ # 17:30 annbass cwebber: that is, strip down ASub and use LDN for those processes? # 17:31 annbass cwebber: hmm, I need to talk with tsyesika and evan .. to make sure there aren't unexpected glitches # 17:31 annbass cwebber: let's sketch this out next week, when you come visit ... interesting idea; I hadn't thought about it # 17:32 annbass ... let's sketch it out together, and then take it to evan and tsyesika to see if it's feasible # 17:32 annbass rhiaro: this is part of the idea re: modularization # 17:33 annbass cwebber: a potential sticky issue, but probly not a blocker... # 17:34 annbass ... modularizing these functions, might fracture <something> # 17:35 annbass ... part of what Social Web Protocols will do is sketch out how the whole system will look # 17:35 annbass cwebber: cool; I certainly think it's interesting. Not totally sold, but I'm close # 17:36 annbass rhiaro: great; it'll probably help if I write up my other notes # 17:36 annbass cwebber: that's it for me; for what I'd written down... anything else to discuss # 17:38 annbass cwebber: do you get the whole container all at once, or do you get a stream? # 17:39 annbass rhiaro: trying to find the balance on how to specify that ... I think we have an issue on that # 17:39 annbass cwebber: uses AS2 version of things, but I guess that's an omission in our spec Karli joined the channel
# 17:43 annbass rhiaro: all the points of alignment are listed in Issue 36 # 17:43 melvster "You asked for a large thing, this is the first page of it. See Proposal [1]" # 17:44 annbass ... next week I'm taking a small trip to visit cwebber, where we can hack on stuff and see if it actually works # 17:46 annbass cwebber: need to talk with E and T, but doesn't seem like a big deal # 17:49 annbass cwebber: how about if we both file an issue on that, but make the point that we both agreed on this call! Karli joined the channel
# 17:52 Zakim As of this point the attendees have been annbass, rhiaro, cwebber, csarven, sandro, KevinMarks Karli joined the channel
Karli and shepazu_ joined the channel
# 20:13 Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed # 22:19 csarven cwebber2 Heya. Really glad to hear that you think so. It is coming along alright :) Some 'minor' issues to resolve on github and AP alignment. Then ? Then we profit # 22:20 cwebber2 whew! glad to finally see some profit out of all this spec-work ;) jasnell joined the channel
@cmal_PP @togakangaroo Well there's a new draft for JSON representation of microformats2 : https://www.w3.org/TR/jf2/ so that's a progress :) (twitter.com/_/status/763026283999756289)
RRSAgent logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/08/09-social-irc
KevinMarks Present+
melvster seeAlso: "A new HTTP response code say 209" https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Dec/0041.html
Loqi Abasset made 1 edit to [[Socialwg/2016-08-02]] https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?diff=99171&oldid=99067